{"id":6185,"date":"2025-08-01T05:00:30","date_gmt":"2025-08-01T05:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/weak-bitcoin-treasury-companies-will-be-crushed-by-bear-market-insider-warns\/"},"modified":"2025-08-01T05:00:30","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T05:00:30","slug":"weak-bitcoin-treasury-companies-will-be-crushed-by-bear-market-insider-warns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/weak-bitcoin-treasury-companies-will-be-crushed-by-bear-market-insider-warns\/","title":{"rendered":"Weak Bitcoin Treasury Companies Will Be Crushed By Bear Market, Insider Warns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The latest What Bitcoin Did episode, hosted by Danny Knowles, turns squarely to the question stalking one of the market\u2019s hottest trades: can the boom in \u201cBitcoin treasury\u201d companies withstand the next prolonged drawdown? Dylan LeClair, who helps lead the Bitcoin strategy at Tokyo-listed MetaPlanet, argues the answer rests less on ideology than on balance-sheet engineering, scale, and the willingness to endure volatility without blinking. \u201cThere\u2019s sort of a \u2018gradually then suddenly\u2019 inflection point,\u201d he said, describing how corporate exposure to Bitcoin has migrated from gimmick to boardroom agenda. The shift, in his view, is irreversible, but survival \u201cis a constant fight with gravity\u201d for firms that trade at premiums to their net asset value (NAV).<\/p>\n<h2>Why Some Bitcoin Treasury Companies Won&#8217;t Survive The Bear Market<\/h2>\n<p>LeClair\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/DylanLeClair_\/status\/1950662393975181448\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">thesis<\/a> starts with market structure. Bitcoin is homogeneous collateral, but public equities are not. Liquidity, index inclusion, and the absolute size of a balance sheet produce a \u201cwinner-take-most dynamic,\u201d he said. Even where two issuers have the same headline premium, the gravity of size changes the calculus: \u201cStrategy is at a measly 1.8x premium, but the premium is like $50 billion of value,\u201d he noted, contrasting that with the far smaller absolute premia attached to emerging players. Premiums compress mechanically as companies buy more Bitcoin or as the price rises, he added, which means maintaining a rich multiple demands ever-larger inflows of capital.<\/p>\n<p>Pressed on what a bear market would do to those premia, LeClair separated cycle folklore from funding reality. He does not buy the inevitability of a 70% \u201cpack it up for three years\u201d drawdown as a base case, arguing the market now tends to reprice and then chop for extended periods. But he is unequivocal that a risk-off phase would punish sloppy balance sheets. \u201cThere will be pressure on MNAVs\u2026 Are you levered? With what sort of debt? Do you have secured debt where your Bitcoin\u2019s encumbered? Do you have debt due in one year?\u201d By contrast, he pointed to perpetual preferred equity\u2014dividends but \u201cno debt maturity ever\u201d\u2014as a structure that removes the most dangerous cliff: \u201cWith the prefs it\u2019s like, no, we\u2019re not selling actually ever.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For MetaPlanet, he framed risk management in deliberately dull terms: \u201cWe\u2019re focused on staying\u2026 pristine, maintaining maximal flexibility.\u201d He cited a \u201cBTC rating\u201d of roughly 16.5x\u2014\u201cwe have 16 bucks of Bitcoin for every dollar of debt\u201d\u2014as intentional dry powder rather than under-optimization. The stress test, to him, is behavioral as much as financial: can management \u201ceat the 70% bear market\u201d if it comes? He expects casualties. \u201cIt\u2019s naive to say that every company that adopts Bitcoin will be a success\u2026 there will be failures. There will be a bankruptcy\u2026 it\u2019s a brutal, competitive world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Where, then, is the moat? Not merely in being public, he argued, but in graduating from equity capital to the far deeper fixed-income markets. Convertibles provided early leverage\u2014but at a cost he described with traderly bluntness. Convertible desks \u201cwoo you,\u201d then short aggressively to hedge, \u201cdampening the volatility\u201d that many treasury companies actually want in their common stock. The more durable solution, he said, is permanent capital in the form of preferred equity. Here he credits Michael Saylor\u2019s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) with reaching \u201cescape velocity,\u201d pioneering a layered capital stack that now includes a new variable-rate preferred dubbed \u201cStretch\u201d (ticker: STRC).<\/p>\n<p>Stretch is engineered to keep trading near $100 by adjusting its dividend and, if necessary, issuing new shares or calling them at $101\u2014\u201ca pretty genius feat of financial engineering,\u201d in LeClair\u2019s words, because it behaves like a cash-equivalent for investors without imposing maturity cliffs on the issuer. Strategy priced STRC in late July with an initial dividend framework and then closed a multi-billion-dollar offering, with the company describing the instrument as variable-rate, perpetual preferred stock designed to pay monthly and target trading near par.<\/p>\n<p>LeClair sees this as the practical realization of a long-standing ambition in crypto finance: a dollar-like instrument tied to Bitcoin collateral, without forcing asset sales in stress. Unlike algorithmic stablecoins that were vulnerable to redemptions spirals, Strategy\u2019s preferreds are senior to common equity and massively over-collateralized by transparent Bitcoin holdings, he argued. External observers have reached similar high-level descriptions: Strategy\u2019s own materials emphasize STRC\u2019s variable dividend on a stated $100 amount, while coverage in financial media notes the offering\u2019s explicit aim to hew to par and its place alongside earlier preferreds (Stride, Strike, Strife) in a capital stack backed by tens of billions in unencumbered Bitcoin.<\/p>\n<p>All of this feeds the consolidation logic LeClair expects in a downturn. Preferreds, he said, are both offensive and defensive. Offensively, they add dry powder to buy more BTC or even buy back common if MNAV compresses, reversing flow against short sellers \u201cplaying this spread game.\u201d Defensively, they function as an \u201cMNAV defense mechanism,\u201d easing reliance on converts and the gamma-trading that \u201cneuters volatility\u201d in the common. If markets turn, he anticipates classic Wall Street behavior: opportunists will \u201cclear off some debt, buy the Bitcoin at a discount.\u201d MetaPlanet, he added, is not seeking to be a roll-up; the focus is \u201claser\u201d on BTC itself.<\/p>\n<h2>Could Anyone Catch Strategy?<\/h2>\n<p>LeClair is diplomatic on peers bringing large private Bitcoin pools public, calling it \u201coverwhelmingly positive\u201d for the asset. But his competitive assessment is stark: \u201cI think Saylor\u2019s reached escape velocity\u2026 a 600,000 Bitcoin lead is pretty insurmountable.\u201d To contextualize that claim with public data, Strategy now reports roughly 629,000 BTC, giving it a commanding lead over other corporate holders.<\/p>\n<p>He adds that only a mega-cap with a decisive pivot\u2014\u201cif Mark Zuckerberg took the orange pill tomorrow\u201d\u2014could realistically challenge, which he deems unlikely given competing priorities like AI.<\/p>\n<p>LeClair is no maximalist about smooth sailing. Premiums will ebb. Funding windows will open and slam shut. Some firms, he warned, are \u201ccosplaying as Bitcoiners\u201d and may abandon discipline at the first whiff of pain. He was also frank about the sector\u2019s self-selection bias: during the good times, new \u201ctreasury companies\u201d appear by the week; the real filter arrives when prices fall and maturities near. \u201cThe times are good now\u2026 there will be a cycle. That\u2019s what will separate the men from the boys,\u201d he said. Survival, in his telling, comes down to a few non-negotiables: unencumbered collateral, long-dated or perpetual liabilities, and management that will not sell into downdrafts.<\/p>\n<p>Yet his broader message is that the game board has changed. Corporate adoption remains \u201cearly innings,\u201d he said, because \u201cthe rest of the world actually simply doesn\u2019t care\u201d yet. The depth of the credit markets\u2014and the emergence of Bitcoin-backed instruments palatable to those markets\u2014may be what finally does the persuading. \u201cIf Bitcoin is going to eat the world\u2026 it has to get to all these different pools of capital.\u201d Treasury companies that make that leap, he believes, can not only endure a bear market\u2014they can use it to widen the gap.<\/p>\n<p>At press time, BTC traded at $118,100.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-796966\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/BTCUSDT_2025-07-31_16-48-31.png?resize=1024%2C454\" alt=\"Bitcoin price\" width=\"1024\" height=\"454\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The latest What Bitcoin Did episode, hosted by Danny Knowles, turns squarely to the question stalking one of the market\u2019s hottest trades: can the boom in \u201cBitcoin treasury\u201d companies withstand the next prolonged drawdown? Dylan LeClair, who helps lead the Bitcoin strategy at Tokyo-listed MetaPlanet, argues the answer rests less on ideology than on balance-sheet&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6186,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[245],"tags":[22,28,29,32,33,34],"class_list":["post-6185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bitcoin-news","tag-bitcoin","tag-bitcoin-news","tag-bitcoin-price","tag-btc","tag-btc-news","tag-btc-price"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6185\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ad-doge.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}